Ivermectin cover up

Ivermectin has been used with good results as an aid to reduce Covid symptoms and in come cases cure it. The drug is highly effective and broad-spectrum, safe, well tolerated and can be easily administered

Yet the FDA and CDC continue to broadly hint at dangers using Ivermectin. Both organizations keep saying it is not safe because has not been proven to help with Covid. That’s a weird statement because the vaccines were not proven to help with Covid – they were, and still are, on an authorized test basis only. 

Research into the history of Ivermectin:

Ivermectin was discovered in the 1970’s by Satoshi Omura, of the Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan. He developed it from a single microorganism isolated in Japanese soil. It’s original use was to kill worms in horses and other large animals. In 1978 Omura succeeded in culturing a strain from which William Campbell purified a substance, avermectin, which in a chemically modified form of ivermectin, proved effective against worms causing river blindness and elephantiasis in humans in tropic-subtopic climates. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate parasitic diseases globally. Link:

Ivermectin: From Soil to Worms, and Beyond, Adelaida Sarukhan , Scientific writer, 11-21-19

https://www.isglobal.org/en/healthisglobal/-/custom-blog-portlet/ivermectina-del-suelo-a-las-lombrices-y-mas-alla/3098670/0

Thus, today it can be obtained for humans in both pill and cream form as well as higher dosages for animals.

Fortunately those two doctors were recognized for their work:

The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2015, half went jointly to to William C. Campbell

and Satoshi Ōmura for avermectin and ivermectin. The other half to Professor Youyou Tu for her discoveries concerning a novel therapy against Malaria. 

Article continues here: Ivermectin cover up

Gross Negligence

 I found this 3 part video and was astounded once again. What is it going to take to get people to wake up? What is it going to take to recognize how corrupt our medical system is? When will healthcare actually be health care? 

68 Reasons to NOT get the Jab

This is a simple list of reasons to not accept the Covid-19 vaccines. Some come from the vaccine manufacturers, and some from the government, but most are just common sense rationale that should be obvious to anyone who thinks for themselves. This list sums up my own personal concerns about the safety, effectiveness, or necessity of the vaccines. I offer this as a comparison to the few, seemingly contradictory, reasons being given to unquestionably accept the vaccines.

1. The three manufacturers, Pfizer, Moderna, And Johnson & Johnson have said don’t take their vaccines if you have allergies.

2. All three have said don’t take the vaccine if you are pregnant or breastfeeding.

3. All three have said don’t take the vaccine if you have a bleeding disorder or are on blood thinner.

4. All three have said don’t take the vaccine if you have heart disease.

5. All three have said don’t take the vaccine if you have a fever.

6. All three have said don’t take their vaccine if you have taken another vaccine.

7. All three have said don’t take the vaccine if you are immunocompromised or on a medicine which affects your immune system.

8. The CDC has said don’t take the vaccines if you have had an allergic reaction to any of the ingredients.

9. If the manufactures, themselves, have advised against the vaccines for certain people, then why do most of the people pushing the vaccines refuse to give any information (or even acknowledge it) on who should not take which vaccine, and which one is best for you?

10. Why do they simply demand, “Do what you’re told.”?

11. If they don’t care that a certain vaccine may be harmful to certain people, they obviously don’t really care about our health and safety.

12. The Covid-19 “vaccines” are a different type of vaccine which has never been approved before. The vaccines are experimental, and we simply don’t know yet how safe they are. It is impossible to know the long-term effects of the vaccines.

13. These “vaccines”, by definition, are not vaccines, but medical treatments.

14. It is against the law for anyone to force a person to take a medical treatment, but many are attempting just that.

15. If the vaccines are safe, why are you required to declare the manufacturers not liable for injury or death?

16. If the vaccines are safe, why do the government officials, pushing for mandatory enforcement of this experimental medical treatment, also have zero liability if it kills you?

17. If the vaccines are safe, why does the government (VAERS) publicly display the numbers of deaths and injuries following vaccinations?

18. Why are these numbers immediately discounted as being unconnected, with no room for discussion?

19. If the vaccines are indeed safe, why aren’t people being openly and honestly told these new “vaccines” have never been used before on humans, and there is simply no way to know what the long-term effects will be?

20. If the vaccines are effective, why do the vaccinated still have to wear masks?

21. If the vaccines are effective, why do the vaccinated still have to be tested?

22. If the vaccines are effective, why do the vaccinated still have to practice social distancing?

23. If the vaccines are effective, why are the vaccinated told to avoid contact with the non-vaccinated?

24. The duration of protection from Covid-19 is presently unknown, the vaccine may remain effective for only a few months, and you won’t know when you are again at risk.

25. Since the vaccine only lasts for a limited time, you will need to be regularly vaccinated, and hope you are protected.

26. Getting the vaccine does not guarantee you will be protected. It can take weeks for the vaccine to provide protection, and then, it is only up to 95% effective.

27. Why are we continually being told that the vaccines are 95% effective when only the Pfizer vaccine is considered to be 95% effective, the Moderna vaccine is said to be 94%, and the Johnson & Johnson is only 66-85%, and why are they changing that to simply “effective”?

28. Any solution that is not 100% effective can do more to spread a virus than no solution at all.

29. Even if you are fully vaccinated, you can still get the virus, because the vaccines do not protect you from the virus, but from the sometimes deadly symptoms.

30. Your getting the vaccine does not protect your family, the community, or anyone around you.

31. Getting the vaccine does not stop you from passing the virus on to others. Getting the vaccine only protects you by hopefully lessening the symptoms if you get Covid.

32. If you get infected with the virus, and don’t have symptoms, you might go about life as normal, ignorantly discharging the virus among society.

33. If those promoting the vaccines don’t care about the safety of the people receiving the shots, and the vaccines do no good to protect others, who are they actually trying to benefit?

34. Why have they continually tried to scare us into taking the vaccine, through bloating the numbers by counting people who died with Covid as dying from Covid? And why is any attempt to discuss truth, instantly labeled a “conspiracy theory”?

35. This would not be the first time our government has performed medical experiments on unwitting citizens.

36. With all the contradictions, flip-flopping, manipulated data and graphs, and outright lies, we’ve been given during Covid-19, why should we believe anything we are told?

37. Forcing anyone to participate in a medical experiment is the same as Nazi doctors performing medical experiments on prisoners, and is criminal under International law.

38. The vaccines and boosters damage the natural immune system, which helps protect us from a virus.

39. Covid-19 is a coronavirus (like a cold). ALL coronaviruses can be prevented and treated through more natural methods.

40. All viruses mutate. This means that to be “protected”, you must continuallyaccept new experimental vaccines or boosters.

41. Most people who have taken the vaccines, have done so out of fear or were bullied by society, corporate America, or the government.

42. Most people who have refused the vaccines, have done so because of a lack of evidence for safety or effectiveness. (Or, because they understand a great many things on this list.)

43. Young healthy people have a 99.9% chance of surviving Covid-19, if they even contract the virus. Why is it that those promoting the vaccines for children, demand that school children wear masks which are scientifically proven to be useless against a virus, but proven to inhibit the immune system?

44. After 2 years of Covid ravaging America, less than 1 in 7 people have statistically been known to contract the virus. That number is even less when you consider the number of reinfections.

45. Why are the number of reinfections “rare” when desiring high numbers of cases, but “likely” when referring to the un-vaccinated?

46. Why would 100% of the population have to take an experimental medical treatment, when the vast majority will probably never even be infected by the virus, and if they were, most would be very unlikely to die from it?

47. If the vaccines were actually useful and necessary, would the government have to resort to authoritarian measures to force people to accept it?

48. Wise and all-knowing Hollywood celebrities have promoted it as cool to get vaccinated.

49. Why does “My body. My choice” give a woman the right to kill her unborn baby, but not your right to protect your own body?

50. We are told that “some” of the vaccines used live fetal cells in their development. If you have any religious qualms about this, you should refuse all vaccines until they (the manufacturers, not the fact-checkers) openly disclose the facts.

51. The Covid-19 vaccines appear to be leading us to acceptance to the Mark of the Beast.

52. Why is Big-Tech so aggressively censoring anyone who even questions the necessity of the vaccines, or their safety or effectiveness?

53. Why does the government and their media so aggressively oppress any scientific debate or evidence on the necessity of the vaccines, or their safety or effectiveness?

54. Why does the global elite, with their boldly proclaimed desire to depopulate the world by 95% demand that all us peasants take the vaccine?

55. Bowing down to tyrants only increases their oppression and tyranny tactics.

56. We have a moral and religious responsibility to resist oppression and tyranny.

57. We have a moral and religious responsibility to protect our nation’s rights and liberties.

58. We have a moral and religious responsibility to stand as an example to others.

59. We have a moral and religious responsibility to protect those weaker than us, through our defiance against tyranny and oppression.

60. According to the CDC’s own numbers, Covid-19 has a 99.74% survival rate, IF you even get the virus. Why would anyone, with enough brain matter to think for themselves, risk a medical treatment, that doesn’t stop infection or transmission, is statistically unnecessary for most people, doesn’t last long, has to be continually redone, might kill you or injure you for life, simply to help overcome a cold that has only a .26% (.16% according to cases vs supposed deaths) chance of killing you if you were to even get the virus?

61. Since the vaccinated can still get the virus, if the vaccines work then why isn’t the survival rate increasing?

62. If the vaccines are effective, why aren’t the number of cases decreasing?

63. If the survival rate isn’t increasing, and the number of cases isn’t decreasing, can we view the vaccines as anything less than a total and complete failure?

64. In two years of being demanded that we wear masks, and still no evidence that they do any good, how many years do we have to wait for evidence that the vaccines work?

65. Why is any attempt to present facts which may question the government narrative, instantly labeled as misinformation, disinformation, or conspiracy theories?

66. Why are Democrats threatening to fine people who ask questions like these?

67. Why did the inventor of the mRNA vaccines recently accuse the U.S. government of “manipulating” vaccine data to mask the “huge number of deaths and adverse events that are directly linked” to the vaccines?

68. Why do experts estimate the number of deaths, caused by the vaccines, to be around 300,000?

“You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” -Mahatma Gandhi

My Jabbed Family Members

In my family, of 8, 2 have been jabbed. My daughter and my brother. My sister, her partner and kids are not and will not be, as well as myself and my partner. 

My 20 something daughter has been dealt the most of it. She had COVID right in the beginning - April 2020. She was down for a couple weeks, lost all sense of taste and smell. She felt good some days, felt crappy flu-like other days. She lost too much weight. She has yet to gain 100% of her senses back. She got 2 jabs this summer - for work. She was a nanny for an uber rich family and they were going to Aspen for vacation and the entire gated community required every person on the property to be jabbed. The first one was fine - the second one put her down for 3 days. I was sick about it. She lives 1100 miles away so I don't get to see her day to day to be able to tell if it has had lasting effects. 

5 days before she and her boyfriend traveled home for the holidays, they both had a slight flu. Him worse than her (he is NOT jabbed) but both were fine after 2 days. The day they arrive home, they get a call from a friend that tested positive. They went to the first CVS and got tests. Both positive. Instant devastation. They both have grandparents to see, family to visit, places to go while home for 8 days. 

1 day later my daughter tested negative. 2 days later, he tested negative. Still, the grandparents do not want to see them. Half of the family does not want to "risk it". This is now year two of my daughter not seeing her Poppa and aunt and cousins. 

I hope that she will not get the booster. 

My 40 something brother is #2 who has been jabbed. His story is a funny one. He had a mild heart issue early in 2021 requiring a stent. He had not gotten jabbed. Late August, he was fainting at work so he went to the ER. After being seen and it was determined that he was on too many meds, and overnight observation was necessary. The results of his COVID test came in positive. He had zero symptoms. They whisked him to a separate wing, in a ward just for COVID patients. He was the only one. In the ward. On the whole floor. He said the nurses wore no more protection than the ER staff. He was given no treatment whatsoever. The next day, he was cleared by the doctor and given his discharge papers. The papers only mention the fainting. Not a word about the COVID. While walking out, he realizes this and asks, "So what about the COVID? You're not giving me any treatment recommendations for the disease I apparently have that has locked down the world and is killing people?" The nurse kind of scoffed at him, "Oh, just quarantine for a week and you'll be fine."

A couple weeks later, he got the J&J jab. He is going to Cancun in January for a concert and no one without a jab can attend. He had no side effects of the jab. So far. 

I am constantly worried about them. Terrified, actually. 

COVID Jabs DANGERS PROVEN

The most detailed evidence yet of the devastating damage COVID jabs can do

---

The COVID jabs are the ‘most dangerous biological medicinal product rollout in human history’ said Dr. Peter McCullough.

LINK TO ARTICLE BELOW

Mon Dec 20, 2021 - 9:36 am EST

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 

(The Conservative Woman) – Injecting millions of people with countless copies of a gene that instructs the body to produce a toxic protein might not seem very sensible. But it was hoped that this approach, the basis of the COVID vaccine, would help minimise damage caused by the protein – the ‘spike’ that the genetically engineered SARS-CoV-2 uses to invade our body cells – when we meet the actual virus.

Last month we reported an American heart specialist’s finding that most of his patients showed biochemical changes signalling increased cardiovascular risk in the weeks following their COVID mRNA jab. Markers for inflammation, cell death and an immune response to coronary artery injury all increased compared with results from a few months previously. The overall results indicated a “dramatic” rise, from 11 per cent to 25 per cent, in the likelihood of a heart attack or similar event occurring some time over the next five years should those changes persist.

The report was presented as an abstract to a meeting of the American Heart Association (AHA), and subsequently published in Circulation, the AHA’s journal. After being made public, an “expression of concern” was added to the abstract, saying there are “potential errors” and it may not be reliable.

There is however every reason to take it seriously – apart from UK researchers reportedly having found similar results, which they are not prepared to publish for fear of losing research money.

Last Friday the most detailed evidence yet of the damage the vaccine can do was presented at an online symposium on COVID science organised by Doctors for COVID Ethics. This is an international group that has long opposed the mass rollout of the COVID jab, arguing in particular that the immune system may attack our own tissues when it detects the presence of the spike protein.

Thousands of deaths have been reported in the wake of the jab, but regulators claim most of these are coincidental, and have neglected detailed investigation of whether or not the vaccine was responsible.

Exactly that kind of investigation was carried out by German pathologist Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who has 40 years of experience in the field. He examined the tissues and organs of 15 patients where a post-mortem had been performed, an exceptional opportunity that came about because the bodies were in institutes of legal medicine and institutes of pathology.

There were seven men and eight women, aged between 28 and 95. They died between seven days and six months post-injection.

In essence, Burkhardt found internal damage in most of the deceased, caused by a self-destruct process in which immune cells – lymphocytes – had invaded different parts of the body.

In five of the 15 cases, it was concluded that the correlation with the vaccination was very probable; in seven, it was probable; and in two cases it was not clear, but possible. “In one case we did not find any of these changes of any significance,” Burkhardt said.

He presented slides showing how the lymphocytes infiltrated heart muscle in particular, causing inflammation. Resulting lesions were small and easily overlooked, “but the destruction of just a few muscle cells may have a devastating effect,” he said. “If the inflammatory infiltration is found where the impulse for the contraction of the heart is given, this may lead to heart failure.”

Another finding, also easily missed, was lung damage caused by the lymphocyte invasion, seen in nearly half the cases. Liver, kidney, uterus, brain, thyroid and skin also showed signs of autoimmune damage.

Summarising Burkhardt’s presentation, Canadian microbiologist Professor Dr. Michael Palmer said: “Anybody with a medical training will see just how devastating the effect of these vaccines can be, at least in those who die after the vaccination . . . we also now know why the authorities were very hesitant to have autopsies performed on such victims.”

Elsewhere, Palmer has argued that even though deaths after vaccination are few compared with the numbers who have received the jab, “the total lifetime dose of these messenger RNA vaccines that you can tolerate before you die is limited. We don’t know the exact amount because there is simply not enough experimental data. That’s one of the great scandals of these vaccines, that no proper toxicity studies have been carried out.”

Animal studies have shown clearly that the jab does not just stay at the site of the injection. It circulates widely, such that the spike protein can combine with receptors in many parts of the body, and especially cells that line our blood vessels, causing both clotting and excessive bleeding. Many sudden clusters of deaths (see here and here) have been reported in the immediate wake of the vaccine drives, also observed in athletes.

Burkhardt’s findings, highlighting immune cell infiltration of tissues where the vaccine-induced spike protein has manifested, come in the wake of many warnings of such a mechanism and are supported by various studies suggesting long-term risks. These include:

U.S. physician Dr. Patrick Whelan warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration a year ago, before the vaccine rollouts, that jabs based on the spike protein may themselves trigger symptoms of severe COVID, including blood clots, brain inflammation and damage to the heart, liver and kidneys. Whelan, a paediatric specialist caring for children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome, urged particular caution over giving the vaccine to children and young adults, as they normally fight off the infection in its early stages. Before any of the vaccines were approved for widespread use in humans, he said, there should be an assessment of the effects on the heart.

The vaccine includes a modification in the RNA code aimed at synthesising abundant copies of the spike protein – running into trillions of molecules, according to this visual display produced by Dr. Charles Hoffe, a Canadian doctor. He says the majority of people who receive the COVID shot “are getting blood clots that they have no idea they’re even having.” The modification, along with a device that protects the RNA mechanism against immediate destruction by the body, may enable the jabs to present a bigger risk in some recipients than natural infection, since this is usually dealt with successfully by a healthy immune system. No one knows exactly how much of the protein is produced by the jab, nor how long it lasts in the body.

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology, says “multiple peer-reviewed references” demonstrate that the virus’s spike protein poisons body cells (see for example here), but the vaccine developers have not demonstrated the safety of their version of the protein. Proper evaluation of the risks is still not being carried out, he says.

Another German pathologist found from autopsies conducted on 40 people, who died in the wake of the jab, that 30-40 per cent were vaccine-related. Professor Peter Schirmacher believes many such deaths are missed, with doctors attributing them to natural causes.

American cardiologist and journal editor Dr. Peter McCullough has warned that the vaccine can damage heart tissue in ways that go unnoticed at first, but which create scar tissue liable to cause permanent cardiac dysfunction later in life. “This will go down as the most dangerous biological medicinal product rollout in human history,” he says. McCullough has also highlighted an increase in deaths among children in the UK since the NHS began vaccinating teenagers aged 12 and over against COVID.

An analysis of UK ‘Yellow Card’ adverse reaction data by Dr. Tess Lawrie’s Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy found thousands of reports of blood clotting after the COVID jabs. Almost every vein and artery was affected, and every organ including parts of the brain, lungs, heart, spleen, kidneys, ovaries and liver, “with life-threatening and life-changing consequences.” Lawrie urged the UK regulators as long ago as last June to declare the vaccine unsafe for use in humans because of the deaths and adverse reactions being reported.

A ‘chilling’ acknowledgement of the specific risks of mycocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (swelling in tissue surrounding the heart) following COVID vaccination was issued this month by the UK Health Security Agency. The agency still insists such cases are rare and that most patients recover fully, but evidence such as Burkhardt’s suggests many deaths may go unrecognised as vaccine-related.

It’s a terrible mess, and there is a desperate need for a review of the entire COVID vaccine strategy. UK pathologists, please come to the rescue!

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-most-detailed-evidence-yet-of-the-devastating-damage-covid-jabs-can-do/ 

The TRUTH about the JABS

I have so many points to make here. I’m just going to list them. 

None of the jabs are FDA approved. Not one. 

The jabs are NOT by definition, actual vaccines. 

The jab is proven to cause serious heart issues.

The jab is proven to cause serious side effects

The jabs became available in record time

The jabs are FREE. Nothing is ever free. 

The jabs are proven to not be effective at all.

Vaccine Madness

 

WHAT IS HAPPENING? 

I am at the point of absolute disbelief. The state of this country is so corrupt and deplorable it’s insane. 

The Covid vaccine became available last January. It really ramped up this summer; you could get it for free at any CVS, etc. People couldn’t wait to get it. I saw absolutely no reason at all to get it. I don’t go to doctors. I don’t take meds. I take vitamins. I smoke my vape pen. I’ve had no need to see a doctor for over 17 years. All but the gyno - I see her every few years. I digress…

I’m not sure why anyone would want to get the vax. I did not understand how seemingly intelligent respectable people were lining up for it. Do any of them take 10 minutes to research something they are going to inject into their body? Their KIDS bodies? I mean, we have instant access to information on our phones. I myself Google every god damn thing I can, because I don’t know a lot about most things, just like everyone else. I want to learn. 

Is it blind absolute trust in our government? It seems so. Is it full trust in the family doctors? I would think yes more so than the government. 

Ok. I get that. People trust authorities. We are supposed to trust our leaders because THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE TRUSTWORTHY. Period. That’s how it’s supposed to be.

Yet now, it seems so silly to believe that. 

This vaccine is unsafe. It has not been fully tested. On humans. It is hurting and killing people and no one knows about it. 

In the UK, during the month of September, Covid deaths in the 40-70 age groups were recorded in a study. The results were terrifying. 

There were 3150 total Covid deaths. 

         551 deaths occurred of unvaccinated people. 

        2601 deaths occurred of VACCINATED people.

Read that again. 

Here are some screenshots from vaersanalysis

The Origin of Chemotherapy

Mustard Gas. 

The Rockefellers and Medicine

The Rockefellers single handedly corrupted the medical system in the early 1920's. 

The Corruption of the Medical System in the US